DEVONThink, KIT, SOHO Notes, Yojimbo

DEVONThink, KIT, SOHO Notes, Yojimbo

I have been using Yojimbo to store stray URLs, snippets of text, software registration numbers, and the like for some time. Recently I decided to test some more full-featured alternatives, to see if I should switch to another application for my information-gathering needs.

I worked with full-featured demo versions of DevonTHINK Pro 1.3.1, KIT (Keep It Together) 1.3.6, and SOHO Notes 6.0, comparing them against Yojimbo 1.4. All of these applications import text, bookmarks, PDFs, and web archives. The interface to all four is roughly similar, but there are big differences in the approach each application uses to gather, manage, retrieve, and export information.

Devon Technologies DevonTHINK Pro 1.31

Summary: This is a flexible, powerful tool with excellent search capabilities, built to serve power users.

Screen shot of DEVONThink

DevonTHINK Pro is arguably the most powerful tool of the bunch. It supports a tremendous range of media types, from addresses to web archives, audio and movie files, and records and forms. If you find yourself working with more than RTF text and PDFs, you will find this broad media flexibility indispensible.

Its search functionality is excellent. Search results appear nearly instantaneously. The results are relevance-ranked, and search terms are highlighted inside results, which makes it easy to quickly sift through search results to find the correct item.

Labeling content is easy, but even more importantly, DevonTHINK supports on-the-fly content grouping. Select the content items you want to group, hit the “Group” button, and voila, a new Group folder appears.

The app provides several pane arrangements, so you can easily configure how the contents housed in DevonTHINK are shown on screen.

DevonTHINK also exports to more formats than the competition, but I found the actual utility of the exported files to be limited. Although it exports to OmniOutliner and .doc format, the exported files include hard carriage returns at the end of each line of text.

If you want to integrate your information-gathering app into one or more processes, you’ll appreciate the range of AppleScripts provided with the application.

DevonTHINK has other bells and whistles. For example, it contains a built-in web browser, and even includes a web server, so you can publish your DevonTHINK database to other users. More usefully for law students, it supports scanning of text directly into the database, so you can scan in text and save it as a searchable PDF.

[6/20/07 Correction: As Jason notes below, Devon Technologies provides a 25% discount to students: http://www.devon-technologies.com/shop/students_js.html]. The Pro version of DevonTHINK costs $79.95. The Personal version costs $39.95, but it does not support AppleScript and does not have the multi-user features of Pro, and there are some limits on the amount of information that can be stored in the database. Despite these differences, the Personal version doesn’t appear to be crippleware. If you want the ability to create multiple databases without size limits, and you want to use the extensive collection of AppleScripts provided, DevonTHINK Pro is the ticket. www.devonthink.com

Reinvented Software KIT (Keep It Together) 1.3.6

Summary: This app does the basics well and provides an easy to use interface. Unfortunately its limited search capabilities are a serious impediment.

Screenshot of KIT - Keep It Together

KIT not only keeps it together, it keeps it simple. The app loads fast. The interface is very iApp-like, with a slide-out info drawer and enviable simplicity. It supports audio and video files, bookmarks, PDF, RTF, and text files. Changing categories, rating, adding comments, and tagging content is simplicity itself.

Unfortunately, KIT falls down because its engine doesn’t delve into the content of files. [8/14/07: See comments 21 & 22 below] Search results come up quickly, but search terms are not highlighted in the body of the searched text. Smart Groups are supported, but they only allow filtering by meta information (date created, file type, etc.) and do not allow filtering by actual content. These limitations are a serious drawback in an information-gathering tool, and mar an otherwise well-implemented application.

KIT costs $24.95, but students can buy it for $19.95. reinventedsoftware.com/kit/

Chronos SOHO Notes 6.0

Summary: Helper tools, support for all kinds of importing and exporting, and unexpected goodies make this a Swiss Army knife application that can do what you expect and more.

Screenshot of SOHO Notes

More robust than KIT, SOHO Notes works with a wide variety of file types, syncs with iPod,.Mac, and Palm devices. It even includes contact, journal, and alarm features; it could conceivably be used as a standalone GTD (Getting Things Done) system.

SOHO Notes does the basics well. Labeling content is easy, and the overall interface is relatively clean and uncluttered, if not as configurable as DevonTHINK Pro. I did find it bothersome that deleting a group takes a bit more work than in the other applications.

Like DevonTHINK, SOHO Notes highlights words inside search results, and its spiffy auto-generated search summary makes skimming search results easier. Over extended use, this summary feature may be more useful than DevonTHINK’s relevance rating.

SOHO Notes does Smart Folders right. Because the app burrows all the way down into content, these folders are more powerful than the Smart Groups in KIT.

It also includes a very useful tool called DockNote. This handy tab sits at the edge of your screen. When you want to drop new content into SOHO Notes, simply drag it to the DockNote tab, then into the appropriate folder. While Yojimbo has a similar feature, DockNote is superior in that you can also open folders from DockNote.

DockNote also keeps a record of your clipboard use, so you can paste in items you cut or copied into the clipboard days ago. This could be particularly useful in report-writing situations.

SOHO Notes costs $39.99. www.chronosnet.com/Products/sohonotes.html

Bare Bones Software Yojimbo 1.4

Summary: This is a lean and clean application that doesn’t attempt to be all things to all people. If you already use other apps for managing image and audio files (or have no real need to manage them), and tend to rely on tagging and folders more than searching, Yojimbo may be for you.

Screenshot of Bare Bones Yojimbo

Unlike the other three apps, Yojimbo does not support audio or video content, and only supports images as PDFs. It is not set up to sync with devices. It does not include alarms, blog posting capabilities, a web browser, or address book integration.

Generally this focus results in a very capable tool that does not get in the way. The Quick Input panel and Drop Dock work in conjunction to make creating new notes or dropping existing text snippets, PDFs, and bookmarks into Yojimbo fast and painless. The Drop Dock is not as capable as SOHO’s DockNote, but it gets the job done.

Yojimbo’s search capabilities lag behind DevonTHINK and SOHO Notes. Because the results give no indicator of relevancy, and no summary of the found text, you’re forced to select each file in the search result and scan it to find the text corresponding to your search.

Yojimbo costs $39, but students can buy it for $29. www.barebones.com/products/yojimbo

Different Strokes…

I wish I could mash the best features of these apps into one. I’m already comfortable with Yojimbo, and I favor small, lightweight apps over sprawling beasts that try to do everything. However, it sure would be nice to have just a few of the features from the other apps.

KIT shows meta information and facilitates tagging in a very elegant fashion.

DevonTHINK Pro’s file grouping flexibility is rather handy, and its window pane options allow for truly useful customization. Its search seems to be the speed winner, too.

SOHO Notes’ search results make sifting through search results easier, which means you find what you’re looking for faster. Its smart folders are flexible and powerful.

The rest I could do without. I don’t need a timer, a web browser, a web server, or the ability to publish from my information gathering application. I don’t need to sync to a Palm device or to my iPod, because my PowerBook is almost always with me anyway.

Since there is no such application on the market, for now I’m going to stick with Yojimbo. One of the things I realized in conducting this exercise is that with Yojimbo is most valuable to me for items that aren’t explicitly tied to a project I’m already working on. Bare Bones Software developed Yojimbo to deal with the problem of free-floating, “maybe I’ll use this later” types of information, and it handles these snippets well.

I already deal with projects that have graphics, audio files, and various types of text information in a reasonably organized fashion, and when I don’t do a good enough job of corralling these files, Spotlight is a great lasso.

Choice is a good thing, and all four of these applications have their strengths. My particular computing needs are by no means universal, and I would appreciate comments from readers who have used one or more of these applications. If you favor one of these apps over the others, it would be useful to hear the reasons behind your preference.

This entry was posted in Reviews & Updates. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

30 Comments

  1. Posted June 5, 2007 at 6:42 am | Permalink

    Good review and it reinforced my opinions on the apps cited. In preparing for the California Bar next month — I’ve been using DT Pro exclusively. A feature I did not see mentioned was the wiki-link feature (either by subject line, aliases, CamelCase, or direct links). This is a very powerful feature. I have about 2,000 notes (all the bar subjects, cases, codes, etc.) in my bar prep DT file and they are heavily linked using the wiki-link feature. I find the “Replicate to” to be very useful — to place replicates specific notes in specific subject folders and only having to edit one replicate. The wiki-link and the multiple options for viewing sold me over Yohimbo, NoteTaker, NoteBook, and OmniOultiner — for heavy duty integrated note taking.

  2. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 5, 2007 at 6:45 am | Permalink

    symtym, you make a good point. I didn’t try to mention every feature DEVONThink Pro offers. There are just so many of them. The wiki-link feature wasn’t big for me because I use OmniOutliner Pro for my outlines and note-taking, but I can see how that would be extremely handy.

  3. Adam Bell
    Posted June 6, 2007 at 12:45 am | Permalink

    Good reviews, but omits Journler; the new kid on the block, an app I’ve abandoned SOHO Notes to use.

  4. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 6, 2007 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the note, Adam. I have noticed recently that quite a few people seem to be using Journler in place of the more traditional information-gathering apps. At present I only use it as a journal, but obviously I haven’t been tapping into its full potential.

    One of the big problems in putting together a review like this is that there is such a wealth of choices for Mac users. I was tempted to talk about Yep, which I use for project-oriented management of PDFs. I also know some people use VoodooPad, Tinderbox, and other apps for keeping track of all their “stuff”.

    In this comparison I was trying to compare apples to apples, but what I really need is for other Mac-using law students to provide examples of what they use to manage information. So if you ever feel like writing an article about how you use Journler, just let me know.

    For anyone who hasn’t already seen it, here’s my January, 2007 review of Journler 2.0.2 (it is now at version 2.5.2).

  5. Tyler
    Posted June 13, 2007 at 2:28 am | Permalink

    Excellent review. I’d be very curious to hear your comments and thoughts on Pagico (www.pagico.com).

  6. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 13, 2007 at 3:39 am | Permalink

    Hi Tyler,

    Thanks for the note. I hadn’t heard of Pagico before. The company that makes it, SevenOnline Tech & Trade Co., Ltd., seems to be new to the English-language software market. Pagico itself looks like a web app that you run locally on your own machine. I found a couple of reviews here: http://www.macupdate.com/reviews.php?id=24949 .

    I would be curious to see how it works. Have any readers given it a spin yet?

  7. ken edwards
    Posted June 13, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    i wold LOVE soho notes, if it worked. but it dosn’t. it opens a message window saying ‘opening database’, which stays there until i force-quit the program. i’m not alone here. look at other postings. Chronos is a company, it seems to me, which is quite happy to charge an upgrade fee for buggy, useless software.

    good review, i just think that potential buyers of SOHO products should be warned about the problems some people have had.

  8. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 13, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the note, Ken.

    I actually came across some of the discussion board messages you mention. I used to use StickyBrain, the predecessor to SOHO Notes, and I never had any problems with the product or the company (aside from the fact that in the end I found Yojimbo better suited to my needs).

    I deliberated about whether to delve into the issue with this review, and ultimately I decided not to delve into it because I hadn’t had any negative experiences and I can only vouch for my own interaction with the company.

    However, customer support is important, and I welcome comments from readers like you who have experience with any of the products in this review.

  9. Posted June 17, 2007 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    great review. thanks.

    I did a devonthink vs voodopad vs journaler review…rather superficial, I admit it. I concentrated on importing and exporting (because in my head that is a mission critial feature, I’m not about to deposit all my college and work notes, snippets, and stuff into an app that can’t export later to something unambiguous), quick editing capabilities and how well each app dealt with different files (from raw text to pdfs to htmls).

    at the end I favored journaler. for simple note taking it’s just perfect for me. I bought devonthink about a year ago and today it feels like an overkill for what I need to do. voodoopad is more of a wiki sort of thing, and having a tottaly locked down free version without 80% of the app’s features (although they list the options on the menus) totally threw me off.

    Again, thanks for a great review.

  10. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 18, 2007 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    Glad you liked the review, FSamurai.

    Journler really has been picking up steam of late.

  11. Robert Hood
    Posted June 20, 2007 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    I recently moved from DevonThink (pro) to EagleFiler. After using DT for several years (and the scanning is a helpful feature) I was concerned about relying on an application that is poorly integrated into other Mac software, uses a proprietary database which can get corrupted and result in data loss, and that has been promising better export capabilities for years but hasn’t delivered. To be fair, after my database got corrupted I was able to recover from a backup, but it made me think very hard about relying on something other than the file system.

    EagleFiler uses the filesystem and Apple’s Core Data for storage, and my impression (after importing my DT files) is that it’s faster, my safer (files remain in their original format) and it’s easier to edit files. DT doesn’t store excel files, and although it imports word files in RTF format, you have to retain the original word file somewhere else on your hard drive. So for me I like the fact that I can just keep 1 system of storage in EagleFiler.

    I still scan my information using a third party scanner, and have found that I actually get better accuracy. So sometimes integrated is not always better, and it may be worth relying on separate programs (scanner and EagleFiler)

  12. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 20, 2007 at 4:23 am | Permalink

    Robert,

    Thanks for the comment. For those interested in checking out Eagle Filer, it’s at http://c-command.com/eaglefiler/ and costs $40. I hadn’t heard of it before, but it certainly looks intriguing.

  13. Jason Wilcox
    Posted June 21, 2007 at 1:14 am | Permalink

    Your article mentioned education discounts for Yojimbo, but you didn’t mention the 25% discount for DevonThink Personal and Professional. Discounts are available through http://www.devon-technologies.com/shop/students_ok.html

  14. Jason Wilcox
    Posted June 21, 2007 at 1:16 am | Permalink

    The link should actually be http://www.devon-technologies.com/shop/students_js.html, sorry.

  15. Erik Schmidt
    Posted June 21, 2007 at 2:06 am | Permalink

    Jason,

    Thanks for correcting my omission. I’ve altered the article accordingly.

  16. Martin
    Posted June 22, 2007 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    I had some problems with the demo version of SOHO Notes and it took 12 days to get a response back. I won’t be buying the full version.

  17. Donal Leader
    Posted July 4, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Some months ago I noticed that my Address Book had lost all detail other than names. I suspected a virus. Only reading some postings on Soho Notes did I find what really happened. My last Soho sync just junked the Address Book files. What a piece of useless rubbish software.

  18. Posted July 21, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Awesome post. I’ve been using Yojimbo for about two years now and find it really useful for keeping random pieces of information around which I won’t necessarily draw on later for the synthesis of something new. This includes serial numbers, passwords, etc. I’ve been experimenting with DevonThink to cover the other part of the equation – snippets of information that I think might be useful in the synthesis of new information at a later date. Usually I’m not sure exactly how these snippets will be useful, but as I build my DT database, I’m hoping that things will start to come together in ways that I haven’t anticipated. I’m not there yet. I wasn’t familiar with the other two programs that you mentioned. The other one that I’ve tried is Circus Ponies’ Notebook, which I did not find to be very compelling. This was an earlier version than the current one, so it may have improved since then.

    One question: I’ve started to keep my personal journal entries in DT, hoping to be able to integrate these entries with some of the snippets of information that I’m collecting from elsewhere. I’m aware of Mac Journal, but do you know of any other good journaling software for the Mac? I’ll probably stick with DT, but wonder if there’s a good solution that I’m missing. Thanks, and very nice site!

  19. Erik Schmidt
    Posted July 21, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the note, NSIP.

    Many Mac users swear by Journler, a very well-implemented app created by Phil Dow. I use it simply for keeping a journal, but it has many other capabilities. In particular, it makes good use of the iApps, so dropping in multimedia is a snap.

  20. Posted July 23, 2007 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Thanks a lot, Erik. I wasn’t aware of Journler and am reading the link off of our post today. Cheers!

  21. Posted August 12, 2007 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Just a quick note to say that KIT has always searched the contents of files, although not in Smart Groups – something I’m working to address. Thanks.

    - Steve, KIT developer

  22. Erik Schmidt
    Posted August 14, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Steve. Thanks for the note. I may have been too hasty in my analysis of KIT’s search capabilities. I did try three different search queries, and they didn’t appear to be searching inside the contents of files. It may also be true that because the results weren’t highlighted, KIT was searching inside files but I was unable to spot the located terms.

  23. Posted January 18, 2008 at 5:30 am | Permalink

    Great review. You might also give DocumentWallet a look see. It hits the sweet spot for me as a litigator who has to move a lot of paper around. It does more with less.

  24. Posted January 18, 2008 at 6:17 am | Permalink

    Neil,

    Thanks for the note. Yet another app to add to the list. Gee, it’s such a shame there are so few useful apps for the Mac. ;-)

  25. Posted July 19, 2008 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    MacZot has a special out today on DEVONThink Personal == $24.95 for today only, at http://www.maczot.com = might [or might not] be worth checking out. I know that with Spotlight, I would rather not create yet another place for storage of everything for searching purposes, and just use Spotlight itself, but perhaps Erik, you’ve reviewed it more recently? Or will?

  26. Posted August 1, 2008 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Victoria,

    For some reason your comment was trapped as spam. Bummer about the delay. As for a new review of DEVONThink Personal, that would be a good idea. Time to add it to the list!

  27. Posted August 13, 2008 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    what pisses me off about Devothink that it poses as a file management app at the same time. Though it fails to physically move any files which you move in Devo. This creates a huge problem when you are working with lots a data, and files. Had the same problem with PersonalBrain, otherwise a highly recommended product. :)

  28. Posted May 31, 2009 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the review. I am new to mac and looking for PIM apps.

    I have been using DT for some weeks now and absolutely love it.

    But there is still the need for a good note app. I found Yojimbo much too limited, the interface of Circus Ponies Notebook makes me cry and Caboodle is a nice try, but not really up to it. Soho Notes has about the features I need but search is very slow and there are so many bad comments out there about it. I tried every PIM app I know of but found no alternative to SOHO so far…

  29. Posted October 29, 2010 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Wow! Great review. It will keep me busy for some time. Btw as a developer I can say that SOHO Notes is great app.

  30. Wayne
    Posted November 23, 2010 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    I’d love to see you update this review with the latest versions. Add in Eaglefiler, and note that Journler is no longer in development.

    I think SOHO had bad customer support for a while, but may have moved beyond at now. I’m certainly leaning towards SOHO Notes because of the features and the iPhone app. Eaglefiler is appealing because of its emphasis on preserving your documents and seems to have great features if you want to archive a lot of emails. (It also seems to keep more meta information on imported items. Then again, I like Bare Bones a lot, so Yojimbo is appealing…

6 Trackbacks

  1. By DEVONthink Pro em promoção «  Mac² on October 26, 2007 at 10:18 am

    [...] Mac Law Students [...]

  2. [...] giving this review a go, should take a peek at Erik Shmidt’s review of Devonthink, KIT, SOHO Notes and Yokimbo. there’s other apps out there that I didn’t cover in my humble review that might just be [...]

  3. [...] useful for legal writing, advocacy, complex litigation, and policy classes.A year ago I compared DEVONthink Pro to KIT, SOHO Notes, and Yojimbo. All of these apps have changed in the intervening year, but that article may be a helpful starting [...]

  4. [...] giving this review a go, should take a peek at Erik Shmidt’s review of Devonthink, KIT, SOHO Notes and Yokimbo. there’s other apps out there that I didn’t cover in my humble review that might just be [...]

  5. [...] Devonthink, KIT, SOHO Notes, Yojimbo – A fairly thorough review of four handy applications. Other than Yojimbo, all of the other apps have been through at least one major revision since this review. [...]

  6. By MacUpdate Bundle – 10 Apps for $49 on December 8, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    [...] (could be quite handy in law school – see this woefully out of date MLS post for [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>